Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Chandrasekaran – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office Thiruporur, Chengalpattu District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to registration of deed due to missing document. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. requirement for non-traceable certificate under registration act. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's directive to register provided conditions are met. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal slip issued by the respondent dated 20.01.2026 refusing to register the settlement deed dated 20.01.2026 presented by the petitioner for registration, on the ground that the petitioner has not produced the original parent document.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original parent document is missing, and therefore, the petitioner is not in a position to produce the same before the respondent.
3. As per Section 34-C of the Registration Act, there is a necessity to produce the original document or non-traceable certificate.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will take all efforts to obtain a non-traceable certificate to enable the petitioner to get the settlement deed dated 20.01.2026 registered by the registration department.
5. In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to regis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
