Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
Yesodhammal (Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
M.Sasikala W/o.S.Mohan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. recognition of class ii heirs in possession. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on the maintainability of the petition. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 5) |
Order
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated
20.02.2026 passed in E.A.No.1 of 2026 in E.P.No.168 of 2025 in O.S.No. 4394 of 2010 on the file of the XXVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. Heard Mr.M.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Sundar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. According to the learned counsel for the revision petitioners, the petitioners are the Class II legal heirs of the deceased Judgment Debtor. The Class I legal heirs are available and without impleading them, the Execution Petition is not maintainable.
4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent / Decree Holder would submit that I.A.No.1 of 2026 was filed only to recognise the revision petitioners, who are admittedly in possession, as the legal representatives of the deceased Mari and not as the legal heirs of the deceased Mari, the fourth respondent. He would further submit that despite being called upon the particulars of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
