Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI, J
Mrs.Nayeem – Appellant
Versus
Mr.Arshad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to validity of settlement deed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against decree execution. (Para 4) |
| 3. court discusses trial court's ruling. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court cites precedent for decision. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
The revision petitioner is the judgment debtor, challenging the dismissal of the Section 47 application filed by the petitioner, filed the present Civil Revision Petition.
2. I have heard Mr. L.G. Sahadevan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohamed Hasain, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Mr.Sahadevan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner would state that the respondent has filed OS.No.8787 of 2010 claiming to be the owner of the suit property, having acquired the same under a registered settlement deed executed by his mother, who is none else than the mother of the petitioner also. Mr.Sahadevan learned counsel for the petitioner would further state that the mother herself was not the actual owner, but only a benamidar of the father of the petitioner and the respondent, viz., late Abdul Mujeeb and therefore, the settlement deed is not valid, to be acted upon. The learned counsel would further state that even during the lifetime
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
