COMMON ORDER

The decree holder is the revision petitioner in both the Civil Revision Petitions.

2.I have heard Mr.V.Haribabu, learned counsel for the revision petitioner in both the revision petitions and Mr.Ravi Kumar Paul, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.B.Murugavel, learned counsel for the 3^rd respondent in CRP.No.4900 of 2023.

3.The respondents 1 and 2, despite multiple attempts to serve them, have remained elusive and evasive and hence, this Court has directed the revision petitioner to effect paper publication. In compliance with the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner has also effected paper publication in DT Next, Chennai Edition, English Daily and Malai Malar, Chennai Edition, Tamil newspaper dated 04.02.2026 and 05.02.2026. The respondents 1 and 2 are called and set ex-parte.

4.The facts, that are necessary for disposal of these revision petitions are as follows:

The Managing Director of the first respondent had approached the petitioner and purchased cotton bales from the petitioner on credit basis. A promissory note was executed by the Managing Director of the first respondent for Rs.30,76,125/- on behalf of the first respondent Company. In view of default committed