Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
The Project Officer, Namakkal Highways Authority of India – Appellant
Versus
M.Mahalingam (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of land acquisition proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments about deposit adjustments. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. court's interpretation of deposit adjustments. (Para 5 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. conclusion regarding adjustment and dismissal. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. final directive and implications. (Para 16 , 17) |
COMMON ORDER
These revisions arise under land acquisition proceedings initiated by the National Highways Authority of India.
2. I have heard Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned Senior Standing Counsel, National Highways Authority of India and Mr.NSubramaniyan, learned counsel for the respondents/landowners.
3. The short point involved in this revision petition is as to whether a deposit made pursuant to an interim order granted at the time of admission of the appeal, challenging the enhancement of compensation by the Reference Court would have to be adjusted towards the principal award compensation or towards interest.
4. Arguments were advanced by the learned counsel on either side in this regard.
5. Mr. Su.Srinivasan, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the petitioner would straightaway take me through to the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in AS.No.386 and 387 o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
