Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. BALAJI, J
V.Kasthuri Chetty (deceased) – Appellant
Versus
P.E.Raghava Chetty and Sons – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. affidavit to vacate premises by specified date. (Para 1) |
| 2. court dismissed revision for lack of merit. (Para 2) |
| 3. respondent to refrain from execution until petitioners vacate. (Para 3) |
| 4. final decision to close connected miscellaneous petition. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Pursuant to the order dated 23.02.2026, the 5th petitioner for himself and also solemnly undertaking on behalf of other petitioners has today filed an affidavit of undertaking dated 26.02.2026, undertaking to vacate the tenanted premises viz., GroundFloor bearing Old No.148 New Door No.107, Rasappa Chetty Street, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003 on or before 31.10.2026 without seeking any further extension of time. The copy of the affidavit has also been served on the learned counsel for the respondent, who has no objection for grant of time till 31.10.2026.
2. In the light of the above, while dismissing the revision, finding no merit in the grounds being raised challenging the concurrent orders of eviction passed by the Rent Controller and the appellate authority under Section 10(3)(a)(3) of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, there is no merit in the revision and the civil revision petition is di
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
