Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
Muniyandi – Appellant
Versus
K.Dinesh Raja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts related to the possession and claims over the suit property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner sought amendment for specific performance amidst a suit for injunction. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments centered on the timing and nature of the amendment application. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 20) |
| 4. court's observations addressing the implications of amendments concerning limitations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. final ruling dismissed the civil revision petition. (Para 22) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the trial Court, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff, seeking amendment of plaint.
2. The petitioner herein filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondent/defendant from interfering with his possession and enjoyment over the suit property and from evicting the petitioner except by due process of law.
3. According to the petitioner, he is carrying on the business of whole sale trade in iron and steel in the form of sheets and coils. Since there was dearth of space for operation of petitioner's business, the petitioner's younger son, M.Shankar purchased an extent of 1800 sq.ft of la
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
