SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 16735

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Sirajudeen S/o. Sagul Hamed – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Office Of The District Collector Perambalur – Respondent
W.A.No.544 of 2026 | W.P.No.44418 of 2025



Important Points

Court affirmed the lower court's decision and dismissed the appeal, stating no interference was necessary.

Subject

Administrative Law - Judicial Review

Headnote

The appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent seeks to set aside the order dated 02.12.2025 in W.P.No.44418 of 2025. The court, upon reviewing the impugned order, determined not to intervene and thereby dismissed the appeal while granting the liberty as previously set by the learned Single Judge. The court concluded, stating that there would be no order as to costs.

Advocates:
For the Appellant(s): Mr. V.Raghavachari Senior Counsel, Mrs. V.Srimathi
For the Respondent(s):Mr. M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate

Table of Content
1. court decided against interference (Para 1)
2. final decision with no costs order (Para 2)

On perusal of the impugned order, we are not inclined to interfere with the same.

2. Appeal is dismissed with liberty as granted by learned Single Judge. There shall be no order as to costs.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top