Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Velmurugan, B.Pugalendhi, JJ
M.Sivasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner purchased land designated for temple use but faced eviction due to failure to comply with legal regulations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the court evaluated petitions contesting eviction orders based on prior land ownership claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. the court acknowledged mismanagement of temple properties necessitating legal compliance by possessors. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. petitioner attempted to negotiate lease terms while contesting previous legal rulings on their property. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. the judgment directly concluded with the dismissal of all writ appeals due to lack of merit. (Para 19) |
COMMON ORDER
These writ appeals are arising out of the common order dated 03.07.2025, passed by the writ court in WP(MD)Nos.5906, 5916, 5918 and 5917 of 2025 respectively.
2.The appellant Sivasamy is running shops and a factory in the name of Shobika Impex Private Limited, manufacturing insecticide mosquito nets, in S.Nos.570, 574 and 577 of Aathur village, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District. These lands belong to the Arulmigu Balasubramanya Swami Temple, Vennaimalai, Karur. Though the lands are in the name of temple, pattas were issued during the settlement period in the name of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
