SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 16847

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. DHANABAL, J
Murali Rangarajan – Appellant
Versus
Mr.T.V.Prabhakaran – Respondent
TOS NO. 2 OF 2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Krishna Ravindran
For the Respondents: Ms.Mythrayi Kasthurirangan for Mr.K.Harishankar for R1
Ms.Louis Sharmila for R2 to R4

The court allows video conferencing for evidence presentation based on the applicant's medical condition and logistical constraints.

Headnote:This application concerns the 4th defendant, Murali Rangarajan, seeking permission to file proof affidavit via video conferencing due to his senior citizen status and inability to travel from the USA. The respondents raised no objection to this application, leading the court to grant the request, conditional on adherence to the relevant Video Conferencing Rules. The matter is to be posted for evidence recording on 17.03.2026.

Table of Content
1. request for permission to adduce evidence via video conferencing due to medical reasons. (Para 1 , 2)
2. objections raised regarding procedural compliance for video conferencing. (Para 3)
3. permission granted contingent on adherence to video conferencing rules. (Para 4 , 5)

PRAYER:This application has been filed seeking to permit the Applicant/4th Defendant namely Murali Rangarajan to file proof affidavit and adduce evidence through video conferencing.

For Applicant(s): Mr.Krishna Ravindran For Respondent(s): Ms.Mythrayi Kasthurirangan for Mr.K.Harishankar for R1 Ms.Louis Sharmila for R2 to R4

ORDER

This application has been filed seeking to permit the applicant/4th defendant namely Murali Rangarajan, to file proof affidavit and adduce evidence through video conferencing.

2.According to the applicant, he is the 4th defendant in the main suit and the Testamentary Original Suit has been filed for grant of Letters of Administration in respect of the registered Will dated 14.08.2000 executed by his father namely Mr.T.V.Rangarajan. The applicant is one of the beneficiary of the said Will. He has to adduce evidence in respect of the Will dated 14.08.2000 in the original proceedings. However, the applicant is a senior citizen and he is residing in USA and due to his medical condition, he is unable to travel from USA to India. Therefore, he filed the present application to permit him to adduce evidence through Video Conferencing.

3.The learned counsel for the respondents/defendants made an objection on the ground that the applicant is trying to examine himself as a witness without following the Video Conferencing Rules and apart from that they have no objection.

4.Considering the nature of application and the reasons stated therein, it is appropriate to allow this application. Accordingly, this application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to adduce evidence through Video Conferencing subject to the Rules framed in this regard.

5.Post the matter before the learned Master on 17.03.2026, for recording evidence.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top