Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
G.Jaisankar – Appellant
Versus
G.Sivakumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed under section 96 of cpc. (Para 1) |
| 2. parties amicably settled disputes. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. additional terms for potential sales included. (Para 4) |
| 4. final decree passed based on compromise. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
This appeal suit has been preferred to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.1 of
2022 in O.S.No.218 of 2018 on the file of the Additional District Judge II, Poonamallee dated 08.02.2023.
2.I have heard Mr.Adinarayana Rao, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr.G.Sivakumar, learned counsel for the respondent.
3.Pending the first appeal, the parties have amicably settled the disputes and have reduced the terms of compromise by way of a Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 26.02.2026, along with the sketch, which shall form part and parcel of the decree passed in the appeal. The parties request the appeal suit to be disposed of, in terms of the said joint compromise memo.
4.At this juncture, the learned counsel on either side, on instructions from their respective clients, requested for an additional clause to be mentioned in the decree, though the parties have not incorporated the same in the terms of the joint compromise memo. The parties are agreeab
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
