Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
Shaikh Abdul Rahim S/O. KS Mohideen – Appellant
Versus
M.D.Ismail Sait S/O. Late M.D.Ibrahi Abdullah Sait – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed a civil revision petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. rent court's authority limited by tamil nadu act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner requests opportunity to present arguments. (Para 7) |
| 4. civil revision petition dismissed with directions. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Rent Court, returning the miscellaneous petition filed by the petitioner. 2. The respondent herein filed RLTOP No.548 of 2025 seeking repossession of the property on the ground that the petitioner failed to enter into the rental agreement under the provisions of the Tamilnadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act. The petitioner herein already filed a counter resisting the main OP. Now, instant application has been filed by the petitioner seeking leave of the court to file additional counter. The said application was returned by the rent court, even without numbering, on the ground that under the said new Rent Act, there is no provision enabling the parties to file additional counter. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has come before this court.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
