SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 16907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.MARIA CLETE, J
K. Jayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
H. Krishnamurthi – Respondent
Tr CMP No. 101 of 2026 | CMP No. 2334 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.A.Thirumaran
For the Respondents: No appearance

The court prioritizes the convenience of the wife in transfer petitions, especially under financial and familial constraints.

Headnote:This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition was filed under Section 24 of the CPC seeking the withdrawal of H.M.O.P. No.166 of 2025 from the Additional Sub Court at Tindivanam to the Sub Court at Alandur due to the petitioner's circumstances. The court prioritized the wife's convenience in transfer matters, acknowledging her financial and familial challenges. The court granted the transfer request, allowing the case to proceed in Chennai, ensuring no prejudice to the respondent.

Table of Content
1. circumstances warranting transfer of case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. prioritization of wife's convenience. (Para 5)
3. case successfully transferred to chennai. (Para 6)

Order

Heard.

2. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking withdrawal of H.M.O.P. No.166 of 2025 pending on the file of the Additional Sub Court at Tindivanam and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court at Alandur.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner and the respondent are husband and wife and due to matrimonial disputes, differences arose and they started living separately and the respondent has filed H.M.O.P.No.166 of 2025 before the Additional Sub Court, Tindivanam seeking restitution of conjugal rights.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the distance between the petitioner’s residence and the Additional Sub Court, Tindivanam is about 120 kms and the petitioner is living with the aged parents suffering from age related ailments and has got no source of income and hence, it is extremely difficult for the petitioner to travel to Tindivanam for attending every hearing and submits that no prejudice will be caused to the respondent, if the case is transferred to Chennai.

5. Having considered the submissions, this Court is of the view that, in a petition for transfer filed by the wife, the convenience of the wife ordinarily deserves primacy. In the facts placed, it is seen that the petitioner is residing in Chennai with aged parents with no source of income and the proceedings sought to be transferred are pending at Tindivanam. Therefore, this Court is inclined to allow the transfer sought for.

6. Accordingly, Tr.C.M.P. No.101 of 2026 is allowed and H.M.O.P. No.166 of 2025 pending on the file of the Additional Sub court, Tindivanam is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Sub Court, Alandur. The Additional Sub court, Tindivanam is directed to transmit the entire records within a period of three weeks to the Sub Court, Alandur. On receipt of the records, the Sub Court, Alandur shall dispose of the case in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, uninfluenced by any of the observations made in this order.

Consequently, connected C.M.P. No.2334 of 2026 is closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top