IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.MARIA CLETE, J
Madhankumar – Appellant
Versus
Vidyapriya – Respondent
CMP No. 2966 of 2026 | TR CMP No. 124 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer petition for domestic violence case. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. objections to transfer based on jurisdiction. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's ruling based on statutory interpretation. (Para 5) |
| 4. final decision to dismiss the transfer application. (Para 6) |
Order
Heard.
2. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to withdraw D.V.C. No.33 of 2022 from the file of the Additional Mahila Judicial Magistrate Court, Nagapattinam and to transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Nagapattinam.
3. The petitioners are the respondents in the Domestic Violence Case. The first respondent is the wife and the second respondent is the minor child. It is stated that the husband has filed H.M.O.P. No.77 of 2023 before the Family Court, Nagapattinam, seeking dissolution of marriage, and that in view of the pendency of the said matrimonial proceeding, the petitioners seek transfer of the Domestic Violence Case also to the Family Court, Nagapattinam, for avoiding the multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting of judgments. Elaborate oral and written submissions were made by the petitioner side in support of their contentions seeking transfer.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents objected stating that the DV case trial proceedings have progressed substantially and further that a proceeding under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is a proceeding maintainable before the Jurisdictional Magistrate, and such D.V.C. cannot be transferred to the Family Court.
5. This Court has considered the rival submissions. In Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal 2025 INSC 734, decided on 19.05.2025, the Supreme Court has clarified that while Section 26 enables an aggrieved person to seek reliefs under Sections 18 to 22 in any pending legal proceeding before a civil court/family court/criminal court affecting her, Section 26 does not confer jurisdiction on courts other than those contemplated by Section 27 to entertain an application under Section 12 of the Act. Therefore, the relief of transfer sought in this Transfer C.M.P.
cannot be granted.
6. Accordingly, Tr.C.M.P. No.124 of 2026 is dismissed. If any interim order/stay has been granted, the same shall stand vacated and the connected C.M.P. is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.