SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 16934

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN, K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ
The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government School Education Department – Appellant
Versus
S.Manimuthu – Respondent
W.A.(MD) No.247 of 2026 | C.M.P.(MD) No.2711 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.J.Ashok
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Saravanan

Court affirms that part-time service must be considered for pensionary benefits as per existing laws and government orders.

Headnote:The judgment explores the legal provisions surrounding pensionary benefits as amended by the Government order and prior case law emphasizing the equal treatment of incremental part-time service in the context of pension calculations. The court resolves that the current challenge lacks merit based on precedents and existing governmental orders, affirming the lower court's directive to consider part-time service. The court dismisses the appeal, concluding no further issues warrant consideration, thereby upholding the prior rulings.

Table of Content
1. consideration of part-time service in pension benefits. (Para 1 , 2)
2. existing government orders mandate the implementation of previous judgments. (Para 3)

[Judgment of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]

This writ appeal is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge directing the appellants herein to take into consideration 50% of the part-time service rendered by the respondent / writ petitioner as Vocational Instructor for pensionary benefits.

2. This writ appeal deserves to be dismissed in view of the Judgment dated 06.04.2018 passed in W.A.No.882 of 2017 etc., batch by the Principal Seat of this Court and Judgment dated 19.01.2026 passed by this Court in W.A.(MD) Nos.62 & 63 of 2026 and in view of the Government Order in G.O.(Ms) No.127, School Education (Pa.Ka.7(1)) Department, dated

12.07.2023.

3. It is also brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants that the Government has passed an order in G.O.(2D) No.99, School Education (Pa.Ka. 6(1)) Department, dated 11.11.2025, implementing the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ appeal.

4. Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top