IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Prahalad Ram – Appellant
Versus
The National Medical Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criteria for examination discharge decision based on attempts (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. regulation related to attempts upheld (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. final dismissal of writ petition (Para 6) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order, dated
06.02.2025, whereby, the petitioner was discharged from the M.B.B.S course.
2. The ground, on which, the petitioner was discharged is that even though he had made four attempts, he did not clear the first professional M.B.B.S examination and therefore, he was discharged.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that while it is true that the petitioner had earlier filed W.P.No.24526 of 2025 and also W.P.No.37748 of 2025. In both the earlier rounds, the relevant point that when the petitioner has cleared the Physiology Paper – I and Paper – II and has not cleared Human Anatomy and Biochemistry, it was not placed before this Court that in the first attempt in November, 2023, the petitioner was not permitted to write these two papers. Thus, the petitioner was not permitted to appear. Even after the fourth attempt, the respondents themselves had issued a communication that the petitioner has passed Physiology only in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.