SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 16965

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
M/s.Shri Ram Trust – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner – II – Respondent
Writ Petition | EPFA No.138 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Jayaprakash
For the Respondents: Mr.Paneer Selvam for R1, Mr.K.Balaji for R2

The court allowed the writ petition, modifying deposit conditions for appeals under the Code of Social Security, ensuring fair access to judicial review.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The appeal is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and concerns the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Facts of the Case: The petitioner challenges the order dated 25.07.2025 regarding the deposit condition imposed.

Findings of Court:
The total mandated deposit for appeal under the new Code of Social Security is 25%, and the court finds grounds to consider the appeal on its merits.

Issues: The court frames the main question regarding the fairness of the deposit condition imposed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlights that the conditional order should account for the new legislative requirement to only deposit 25% of the amount.

Result: The writ petition is allowed with a direction for the petitioner to deposit Rs.10,00,000 in instalments, upon which the original order will stand set aside.

Table of Content
1. challenging order in epfa no.138 of 2022. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. claim of harsh deposit conditions. (Para 3)
3. consideration of appeal under new deposit mandate. (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER

The writ petition is filed challenging the order passed in EPFA No.138 of

2022 dated 25.07.2025.

2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material records of the case, it can be seen that when the petitioner moved an interim prayer for stay in the appeal filed against the order under Section 7A of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the Tribunal imposed a condition to deposit 45% of the assessment amount. It is stated that the petitioner was able to deposit only a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- and the balance was not deposited. Therefore, the above order dated 25.07.2025 came to be passed.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the condition imposed was harsh and even when the petitioner was trying to mobilise the funds, no extension of time was granted.

4. Mr.Paneer Selvam, the learned counsel takes notice for the first respondent and he would submit that since the conditional order has not been complied with, the appeal is dismissed.

5. Mr.K.Balaji, the learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent.

6. I have considered the rival submissions made on either side and perused the material records of the case.

7. It can be seen that now, under the Code of Social Security, 2020 for entertaining the appeal only 25% of the amount is mandated. Under the said circumstances, since the total amount in the present case is said to be Rs.69,01,434/- and the petitioner has already deposited a portion, the appeal can be considered on its own merits.

8. In view thereof, this writ petition is allowed on the following terms:

(i) The petitioner shall deposit the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- in two monthly instalments, that is, Rs.5,00,000/- on or before 05.04.2026 and the second instalment on or before 05.05.2026.

(ii) Upon such deposit, the impugned order dated 25.07.2025 made in EPFA No.138 of 2022 shall stand set aside and EPFA No.138 of 2022 shall stand remitted to the file of the second respondent for disposal on merits. Once the conditional order imposed by this Court is complied with, EPFA No.138 of 2022 shall thereafter be considered on its own merits in accordance with law and disposed of on or before 31.08.2026.

(iii) Consequently, connected W.M.P.No.9061 of 2026 is ordered and W.M.P.No.9063 of 2026 is closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top