SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 16980

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mrs S.SRIMATHY, J
P.Mathivanan Inbaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.301 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.M.Venkatesh
For the Respondents: Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Mr.M. Muthumanikkam, Mr.M. Rajaraman

The Court emphasizes maintaining order in church administration through appropriate legal measures while allowing for flexibility in organizational arrangements.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus under the relevant provisions, emphasizing the need for police protection concerning the operation of the St. Peter's Church. The Petitioner raised concerns regarding administrative interference by the 5th Respondent, necessitating appropriate legal guidance. The Court found it imperative for Church functionality without disruptions, allowing for an ad hoc arrangement for priest appointment while maintaining parties' right to seek legal recourse. The conclusion states the petition's disposal with no costs.

Table of Content
1. need for police protection and orderly church administration. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. parties retain the right to pursue remedies through appropriate forums. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection and to take necessary action against the interference of the 5th respondent and his men in the day-to-day administration and conduct of services at St. Peter’s Church, Thiruppalai, Madurai District, by the duly elected Committee represented by its Secretary.

2. According to the petitioner, there is an MOU dated 04.03.2017, wherein, under Clause 7, the Bishop may appoint a Priest from the list of three persons circulated by the Thiruppalai Church. As on date, the existing Priest resigned on 13.02.2026. The Bishop has appointed one George Blazey as the Priest of the petitioner Church. Since it is only an ad hoc arrangement, and in order to enable the Church to function properly without any law and order issues, this Court directs the members of the Church, namely:

2. J. hPll; h [_ypal; 3. G. FNshhp xspT

4. D. mkG; Nuh] ; epfr; d;

5. S. ,k;khDNty; N[rd; rhyNkhd;

6. E. vkpkhs; tpfN; lhhpah

7. D. Kj;Jr; nropad;

8. V.J. kNf];

9. A. mUs; Mdej; ;

10. W. &gd ; gpuhqf; s; pd;

11. K.S.Njtjhrd; 12. N. Qhdf ; fz;

13. K. rhku; hI;

14. M. mkphj; uh[;

15. D.uh[d;

to circulate a list of three persons to the Bishop, then the Bishop in turn shall select one person from the list and appoint a priest.

3. To make it clear at the cost of repetition, except Mathivanan Inbaraj, the others shall circulate a list of three names for appointment as Priest. Upon receipt of the list, the Bishop may select any one of the three and appoint him as Priest.

4. This adhoc arrangement is made only to ensure that the Church functions smoothly without any law and order issues or clashes between the groups.

5. Insofar as the rights of all parties are concerned, they are at liberty to approach the appropriate forum and seek their remedies.

6. With these directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top