IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
P.Maheswaran – Appellant
Versus
C.Balamurugesan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compromise reached between parties over cheque amount. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court ratifies settlement and ensures compliance. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. order issued for returning deposited amount to the complainant. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
This Court, on 19.02.2026 and 23.02.2026 had passed the following orders:
“Proceedings dated 19.02.2026 The petitioner, who is sustaining two concurrent judgments of conviction, had preferred this appeal.
2.Today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
3.The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that in this case the cheque amount is Rs.7,70,000/- and an understanding was arrived between the parties and the respondent agreed to receive Rs.6,50,000/- and give a quietus to the issue. The petitioner, so far, deposited a sum of Rs.3,38,000/- to the credit of S.T.C.No.124 of 2013 before the trial Court and in addition thereto, paid a further sum of Rs.1,50,000/-. In total, the petitioner, so far paid a sum of Rs.4,88,000/- and the balance amount of Rs.1,62,000/- is yet to be paid. Despite several reminders, neither the petitioner nor his counsel are responding. Hence, appropriate steps to be taken to ensure the presence of the petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.