SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 17097

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C.KUMARAPPAN, JJ
ARULMIGU PILLAIYAR THIRUKOVIL – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP No. 47691 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Siddarth Sridhar for Mr. R. Bharath Kumar
For the Respondents:Mr. T. Arun Kumar Additional Government Pleader For Rr1 To 5, Mr.E.Sundaram Government Advocate for Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader for R6 & 7, Mr.M.Banu Muthumeeran Additional Public Prosecutor for R8 & 9

Judicial authority mandates enforcement of temple property protections against encroachment, obligating officials to act promptly upon complaints.

Headnote:The judgment concerns the application for a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution urging the removal of encroachments on temple properties by private respondents. Contentions were made regarding inaction by revenue officials despite numerous complaints by the petitioner, a temple, which resulted in the court directing officials to undertake necessary inspections and actions under Section 78 of the HR & CE Act, completing the process within four months. The result of the writ petition was that it was disposed of with directions to address the encroachments.

Table of Content
1. claims of encroachment on temple lands require immediate official action. (Para 1 , 3)
2. petitioner must adequately document issues of encroachment. (Para 2 , 4)
3. court mandates inspection and action against encroachment. (Para 5)

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

Writ Petition has been instituted seeking direction to 1st to 7th Respondents to remove the encroachment made by the private Respondents 10 to 41 in Survey Nos.67/1, 67/3 to 67/30 situated at Thimmapuram Village, Chinna Salem Taluk, Kallakurichi District as per the Order dated 10.01.2025 passed in M.P. No. 19 of 2024 by the 7th Respondent by availing necessary assistance of the 8th and 9th Respondents in the event of any obstruction from the encroachers and further direct the Official Respondents 1 to 4 not to issue Patta to the Private Respondents 10 to 41, based on the Petitioner’s representation dated 06.10.2025 within a time frame.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is a temple, and the properties belonging to the temple are under encroachment. Several representations are submitted to authorities, including the Joint Commissioner, HR&CE Department.

3. Once a complaint is received regarding encroachment of temple properties, temple authorities as well as the competent authorised are bound to conduct an inspection, and initiate action for removal of encroachment to safe guard the temple properties. Officials, failing in their duty to protect temple properties are liable for commission of lapses, negligence and dereliction of duty.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that several complaints have been submitted for removal of encroachments and to resume the temple properties, but the HR & CE officials have not taken any action. He would further submit that Tahsildar is taking steps to issue patta in respect of the temple properties.

5. In view of the above position, respondents 6 and 7, namely, Assistant Commissioner (HR&CE) and Joint Commissioner (HR&CE) are directed to initiate appropriate action against the Tahsildar, if any such pattas have been issued to the encroachers. Appropriate steps are to be taken to protect temple properties, if necessary, by providing documents to revenue authorities. 6. Further, 6th and 7th respondents are directed to conduct an inspection and identify encroachments in the temple properties and initiate eviction proceedings under Section 78 of the HR & CE Act, and remove the encroachments by following procedure and by affording opportunity to encroachers. The entire exercise is directed to be completed within 4 months from the date of receipt of this order.

7. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top