Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
Veeramani – Appellant
Versus
Ravi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the nature and ownership of the suit property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments concerning the necessity for impleadment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning on necessary party jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the trial Court, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking his impleadment in O.S.No.232 of 2023. The respondents 1 and 2 are seeking specific performance in O.S.No.232 of 2023. The respondents 1 and 2 filed a suit for specific performance against the respondents 3 to 5 in O.S.No.232 of 2023 on the ground that they entered into agreement with the respondents 3 to 5 on 22.09.2020 agreeing to purchase the suit property. The petitioner herein filed an instant application in I.A.No.5 of 2023 seeking his impleadment. According to the petitioner, he entered into registered agreement with respondents 3 to 5 for purchase of certain properties on 07.03.2022 and he filed a suit for specific performance in O.S.No.232 of 2022 on the file of Additional District Court, Dharmapuri and the suit is pending.
2. It is not in dispute that the suit property, which is the subject matt
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
