Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
V.Kanimozhi – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of writ petitions and background (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenge against omr-ecr link road formation (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents' interest and technical justification (Para 4) |
| 4. consideration of alignment options (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. technical recommendations and approvals (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. government's approval process for alignment (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. past challenges to acquisitions (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. violation of natural justice and hearings (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 9. public vs. private interest in court's decision (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 10. conclusion on legal aspects (Para 23) |
| 11. final conclusion and dismissal (Para 24) |
COMMON ORDER
All the writ petitions, except WP.No.10035 of 2021, have been filed challenging the impugned award dated 06.06.2024, Modified Alignment Report dated 22.06.2018, Detailed Project Report dated 12.06.2024 and the impugned Notifications dated 27.08.2024 & 28.02.2025.
2. The writ petition, in WP.No.10035 of 2021, has been filed to direct the respondents herein to consider and take appropriate action on the petitioners representation made on 21.12.2020 requesting them to form the proposed Radial Road (link Road) connecting OMR and ECR across
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
