Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
Lawrence Raj – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar, Co- operative Societies – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging an administrative decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding remedies and petitioner's health. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. court's directive for revision application. (Para 7) |
| 4. final ruling on writ petition. (Para 8) |
ORDER
The impugned order passed by the second respondent vide proceedings Na.Ka.No.549 /17/E2 dated 21/03/2019, is put under challenge in the present Writ Petition. Further, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with continuity of service, all attendant benefits and back wages.
2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself.
3. The brief facts of the case is as follows:
3.1. The petitioner joined the second respondent Society as Sales Distributor on 31.10.2009 and he was attached to the Triplicane Fair Price Shop. In the year 2017, there was an inspection conducted by the respondents, in which it was found that the essential commodities were sold without proper entries to the tune of Rs.5,231.85, for which a charge memo was issued and thereafter, the petitioner was placed under su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
