Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
T.Jeyaprakasam – Appellant
Versus
The District Educational Officer (Secondary Grade) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's directive for reconsideration based on eligibility. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. background of petitioner's employment and pending benefits. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding eligibility for benefits despite pending cases. (Para 5) |
| 4. final ruling on the petitioner's monetary entitlements. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The impugned order passed by the first respondent in O.Mu.No.
9459/A3/ 2025, dated 31.12.2025, is put under challenge in the present Writ Petition. Further, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to provide the annual increments with effect from 01.04.2014 in the post of Lab Assistant and award of selection grade with monetary benefits on 01.06.2016 and the 7th Pay commission benefits due to the petitioner, within the time frame as fixed by this Court.
2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing today at the admission stage itself.
3. The brief facts of the case is as follows:
3.1. The petitioner was appointed as Library Attendant on 23.10.2000 in the third respondent school and thereafter promoted as Lab Assistant on 01.06.2006 which was also approved by the department.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
