Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
L.Saravanan – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar, Department of Registration, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to registration refusal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. implications of encumbrances for registrations. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. court's directive for registration. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the refusal check slip dated 26.11.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and to direct the respondent to register the settlement deed presented by the petitioner for registration.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the third respondent.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that when the petitioner presented the settlement deed for registration, the same was refused by the 2nd respondent on the ground that on the date of presenting the document for registration, a mortgage deed is in existence and the same has not been redeemed. The learned counsel would however submit that the property is going to be settled with all encumbrances only and hence, there is no impediment for the 2nd respondent to register the settlement deed. On the said ground, the learned counsel prays for interference.
4. Per contra, the learned Special Government
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
