Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
S.Babu – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of bribery and demand for fitness certificate. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's defense and claim of fabrication of evidence. (Para 4) |
| 3. issues of illegal gratification and evidence. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. court's decision on the quash petition. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This Court on 21.11.2025 had passed the following order:
“The petitioner/A1, who is facing trial in Spl.C.C.No.14 of
2025 for offence under Sections 7 and 12 r/w 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as amended by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, had filed this quash petition.
2.The learned counsel for petitioner vehemently argued that the respondent created and fabricated documents to suit their case contrary to the truth. The petitioner was a former Motor Vehicle Inspector, Grade-I at Unit Office, Kallakurichi. It was projected as though the de-facto complainant approached the petitioner seeking Fitness Certificate for Mahindra Maxi cab vehicle bearing registration No.TN-31-AY-0678. Initially, it was projected that vehicle belongs to one Ramesh and thereafter, when he approached the petitioner, the petitioner said to have demanded Rs.25,000/- for issuance of Fitness Certificate and t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
