Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
R.M.Venugopal – Appellant
Versus
M/s.R.N.Textiles – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction and sentences imposed on the petitioners. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. payment agreements and joint memo of compromise. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's approval of the compromise and acquittal of petitioners. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
COMMON ORDER
Both the Criminal Revision Cases arises out of conviction of the petitioners / accused imposed by the trial Court in C.C.Nos.355 & 356 of 2017 for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentence imposed on the petitioners / accused to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay the cheque amount of Rs.3,00,000/- and Rs.2,27,000/ respectively as compensation with 6% interest from the date of cheque to the respondent / complainant, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. Aggrieved against the same, appeals had been preferred before the Sessions Court in C.A.Nos.124 & 125 of 2019. Both the appeals dismissed on 15.03.2021, confirming the conviction of trial Court.
Hence, the present Criminal Revision Cases have been filed before this Court.
2.In the meanwhile, the petitioners preferred petitions in Crl.M.P.Nos.5744 & 14469 of 2021 seeking suspension of sentence imposed. This Court vide
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
