SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 17344

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI, J
Ramamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
Hamsavathy – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.A.Saravanan

Table of Content
1. court's authority to direct timely resolution of appeals. (Para 1 , 4)
2. request for direction to expedite appeal disposal. (Para 2 , 3)

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

2. The petitioner, who succeeded as plaintiff before the Trial Court in obtaining a decree for injunction, has filed the present Civil Revision Petition seeking a direction for expeditious disposal of A.S.No. 36 of 2017 preferred by the defendants and pending on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Court, Kancheepuram.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the decree was passed as early as on 05.04.2017, on account of the pendency of the appeal from the year 2017, the petitioner is unable to enjoy the fruits of the decree.

4. Considering the limited relief sought for, this Court is inclined to entertain the present Revision and dispense with notice to the respondents, as no prejudice would be caused to them by issuance of a direction for early disposal. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram, is directed to dispose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top