Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
N.Krishnakumar – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Coimbatore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for temple renovation action without permission. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents claim compliance with procedural approvals. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's examination of the legality of actions and permission. (Para 5 , 6) |
..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take action against respondent No.7 to 11 based on the petitioner’s representation dated
13.12.2025.
For Petitioner: Mr.L.Ramu For Respondents: Mr.S.Senthil Murugan Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R6 Mr.S.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader (HR & CE)
R2, R4 & R5 Mr.D.K.Arun Kumar, Standing Counsel for R3 Mr.K.Magesh for Mr.N.Manokaran for R7
ORDER
The writ petition is filed for action against respondents No.7 to 11 based on the petitioner’s representation dated 13.12.2025.
2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the representation and other material records of the case, the grievance of the petitioner is that respondents No.7 to 11, on their own, without any due permission, have undertaken the tirupani works of the temple and they have demolished and reconstr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
