SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 17366

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
Rangaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner, Coimbatore District. – Respondent
Writ Petition (Criminal)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Ramesh
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 to R3

A Writ of Mandamus can be issued to ensure that authorities consider representations in compliance with legal principles.

Headnote:This judgment involves a Writ Petition (Criminal) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner seeks to direct the third respondent to consider a representation dated 18.12.2024. The court finds that a prior representation dated 27.01.2024 was dismissed on grounds that the dispute was civil in nature. The court instructs the third respondent to decide on the new representation within four weeks from receipt of the order. The final outcome mandates action based on merits per law.

Table of Content
1. representation for police action. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs police action within timeframe. (Para 3)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.12.2024 and to take necessary action.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner had earlier given a similar representation on 27.01.2024, pursuant to which, the third respondent police, after conducting an enquiry in Petition No.29 of 2024, found that the dispute between the parties was civil in nature and closed the said complaint, directing the parties to approach the Civil Court. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has given another representation dated 18.12.2024. He further submitted that due enquiry would be conducted by the third respondent and that it would be disposed of within a period of four weeks.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands closed with a direction to the third respondent police to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 18.12.2024, on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

23-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No vkr To

1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner, Coimbatore District.

2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Karamadai, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

vkr

23.02.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top