SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 17933

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Mohammed Shaffiq, J
R.Saranya Devi – Appellant
Versus
A.Chellapandiyan – Respondent
Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.655 of 2025 | C.M.P.(MD)No.19048 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.C. Ramalingam
For the Respondents: G. Rajan

In matrimonial transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is given superior consideration over that of the husband, particularly when she is the primary caregiver of a minor child.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a transfer petition under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking to withdraw a restitution of conjugal rights proceeding from the Family Court, Theni, and transfer it to the Subordinate Court, Aruppukkottai. The parties were married in 2011 and have an 11-year-old son. The petitioner, working as a teacher in Aruppukkottai, cited the difficulty of traveling 220kms to attend hearings while caring for her minor child. The court found that the convenience of the wife should be prioritized. The primary issue was whether the matrimonial proceeding should be transferred based on the relative convenience of the spouses. The court reasoned that Section 19(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act indicates that the convenience of the wife is to be given precedence, a principle consistently upheld by the High Court and the Supreme Court, especially when the wife is the primary caregiver of a minor child. OP No.545 of 2025 pending on the file of Family Court, Theni, is hereby ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the file of Sub-Court, Aruppukottai.

Table of Content
1. background of the matrimonial dispute and the request for transfer of proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. competing claims of convenience between the wife and husband regarding court location. (Para 4 , 5)
3. precedence of the wife's convenience in matrimonial transfer petitions under the hindu marriage act. (Para 6)
4. order for the transfer of the case to the sub-court, aruppukkottai. (Para 7 , 8)

Prayer :

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw OP.No.545 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court, Theni and transfer the same to the file of the Subordinate Court, Aruppukkottai, to be heard and disposed of according to law and thus render justice.

ORDER

This transfer petition is at the instance of the wife. She seeks withdrawal of O.P.No.545 of 2025 from the file of Family Court, Theni and transfer the same to Subordinate Court, Aruppukottai.

2. Heard Mr.K.C.Ramalingam, learned Counsel for Petitioner and Mr.G.Rajan, learned Counsel for Respondent.

3. The marriage between Petitioner and Respondent was solemnized on 07.11.2011 at Arulmigu Kanneeswaramudaiyur Temple, Veerapandi Village, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District, according to Hindu rites and customs. Out of wedlock, a male child was born and now 11 years old. Due to differences, parties have separated. Respondent/husband initiated proceedings in O.P.No.545 of 2025 for restitution of conjugal rights before Family Court, Theni.

4. Learned Counsel for Petitioner would submit that petitioner is now working as Post Graduate Teacher at S.T.R.N. Government Higher Secondary School, Aruppukottai and her son is in sixth standard at Minerva Public School, Aruppukottai. Petitioner has to take care of her 11 year old minor son. Petitioner expressed her difficulty in travelling a distance of 220Kms (to and fro) from Aruppukottai to attend each hearing at Family Court, Theni. She would therefore request this Court to transfer the case from Family Court, Theni to Sub Court, Aruppukottai.

5. Mr.G.Rajan, learned Counsel for Respondent would submit that Respondent, who has been working in the Commercial Tax Department, was transferred to the Office of the Deputy Commissioner (ST), North-I, Chennai, and he is now residing at Chennai. Therefore, it would be difficult for the Respondent to appear before the Sub Court, Aruppukottai.

6. It is relevant to note that Parliament, while amending the Hindu Marriage Act, has incorporated Section 19(iii), permitting a wife to initiate a proceeding in a place where she is residing. This is an indication that convenience of the wife has to be given precedence by the Court. In line with this Parliamentary amendment, this Court and the Supreme Court have consistently held in matters of transfer, convenience of wife should be given a superior consideration than that of husband. As the distance between Aruppukottai and Theni is considerable and since it will be difficult for the wife to leave the child behind and travel to attend the Court, I am inclined to allow the petition seeking transfer as prayed for.

7. In view thereof, OP No.545 of 2025 pending on the file of Family Court, Theni, is hereby ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the file of Sub-Court, Aruppukottai. The Sub-Court, Aruppukottai, is directed to dispose of the aforementioned case expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months.

8. With the above observations, the Transfer Petition is disposed of. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

05.02.2026

Index:Yes/No

Speaking Order :Yes/No

Neutral Citation:Yes/No

gvn

To

1.The Judge,

Family Court,

Theni.

2.The Judge,

Sub Court, Aruppukkottai,

Virudhunagar District.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top