IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Seenivasan K – Appellant
Versus
The Member Secretary – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P.(MD) No.35179 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
W.P.(MD)No.35179 of 2025
and
W.M.P.(MD)Nos.27882 & 27883 of 2025
K.Seenivasan ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Member Secretary,
Dindigul Local Planning Authority,
Dindigul – 624 003.
2.The Commissioner,
Corporation of Dindigul,
Dindigul.
3.K.Kannan ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to
issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the
____________
Page 1 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am )
##PAGE2##W.P.(MD) No.35179 of 2025
second respondent in Na.KA.No.8014/2021/F3 dated 13.11.2025 and in
Na.Ka.No.8014/2021/F3 dated 21.11.2025 and quash the same as illegal
and consequently direct the first respondent to regularize the additional
construction as per the regularization application filed in online application
No.2019030020018142 dated 3.7.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar
Senior Counsel
for Mr.R.R.Kannan
For Respondent No.1 : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran
Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent No.2 : Mr.J.Lawrance
Standing Counsel
For Respondent No.3 : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy
Senior Counsel
for M/s.Roy & Roy Associates
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]
The subject matter of the Writ Petition is the impugned notice issued
by the Dindigul Municipality on 13.11.2025, directing the writ petitioner to
remove five flats constructed unauthorisedly without proper planning
permission.
____________
Page 2 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am )
##PAGE3##W.P.(MD) No.35179 of 2025
2.The short point involved in this case is that the writ petitioner
claims that he made application for regularisation through online on
03.07.2019 and the same not been so far considered by the first
respondent. Therefore, the impugned order has to be quashed.
3.However, it is contended by the learned Counsel appearing for the
third respondent that the impugned order was issued pursuant to the
direction of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.20186 of 2021 dated 25.03.2024 and
after giving due opportunity to the petitioner herein.
4.This Court, to verify whether the applications dated 03.07.2019
alleged to have been submitted by the petitioner herein been considered by
the first respondent and any order passed, called for the records. The
dispatch register produced by the learned Counsel for the first respondent
only indicates that the application for regularisation has been returned
through post on 05.09.2019 but there is no indication or proof to show if
the said communication was received by the writ petitioner. That apart, the
communication of the Joint Director of Town and Country Planning,
Dindigul addressed to the petitioner herein vide Na.Ka.No.1269/2024
dated 20.03.2025, indicates that his representation dated 30.07.2024 was
____________
Page 3 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/03/2026 11:31:26 am )
##PAGE4##W.P.(MD) No.35179 of 2025
not considered since his earlier request for regularisation dated
05.09.2019 was returned seeking further clarification and clarification was
not received even after expiry of one year. This communication also
indicates that the non-consideration of the application for regularisation
was informed to one K.Kannan, who is the third respondent.
5.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that
even this communication was not received by him though the petitioner's
name is shown as the addressee.
6.In any event, we find that the application of the petitioner herein
for regularisation not been considered on merits so far. In such
circumstances to give an opportunity to the petitioner herein, we direct the
petitioner herein to submit his application for regularisation in person to
the first respondent within a period of two [2] weeks from today. On receipt
of the application for regularisation, same has to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.