SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18063

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
S.R.Raja – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY S.R.Raja ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thuvakudi Police Station Trichy District.

3. Achar Singh ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to grant police protection to the petitioner to run the mill situated at E51, Industrial Estate, Thuvakudi, Trichy District.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to grant police protection to the petitioner to run the mill situated at E51, Industrial Estate, Thuvakudi, Trichy District.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that he is a lessee of the said mill and that the third respondent is its owner. According to him, certain third parties are inducing the third respondent to evict him and hand over the mill to them. In this regard, there was a scuffle between the petitioner and the third respondent. It is further alleged that the third parties had given life threats to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner seeks police protection for his life as well as to run the Mill.

3. This Court is of the considered opinion that police protection cannot be granted for the purpose of running the mill. However, the official respondents are directed to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner for his life, if there is any real threat and the cost shall be borne by the petitioner. As far as the relief sought to run the mill is concerned, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent Civil Court for appropriate remedy.

4. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

27.01.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No jbr To

1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thuvakudi Police Station Trichy District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY , J .

jbr

27.01.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top