SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18145

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
N.V.Selvadurai – Appellant
Versus
State through the Inspector of Police, SPE:CBI-ACB, Chennai – Respondent
CrlA(MD)No.52 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Sivakumar
For the Respondents: Mr.Muthu Saravanan, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI

The court granted bail pending appeal due to lack of substantial evidence and procedural violations, emphasizing the need for fair treatment among co-accused.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 311 - Bail - Petition for suspension of sentence - Petitioner, found guilty in CC.No.9 of 2012, seeks bail pending appeal - The petitioner is a postman, with a claim of no substantive evidence provided by prosecution; violation of procedure under Section 311 of CrPC alleged. Court acknowledges arguable points raised and allows suspension of sentence pending the appeal. (Paras 1, 2, 5, 6)

(B) Conditions for bail - Petitioner to execute a bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties; must file an affidavit assuring non-misuse of liberty; and report before trial court monthly. (Para 6)

Findings of Court:
The urgency of appeal hearing acknowledged due to the period of imposed sentence and co-accused’s bail.

Issues: The primary issues included the validity of the conviction, substantiation of the prosecution's case, and procedural violations.

Ratio Decidendi: Court held that the suspension of the sentence was warranted given the circumstances surrounding the co-accused and the arguments presented without concluding the merits of the appeal.

Result: Petition allowed, sentence suspended.

Table of Content
1. petition overview and details of the case. (Para 1)
2. arguments of petitioner and respondent regarding the appeal. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's considerations and reasoning in allowing bail. (Para 4 , 5)
4. final order granting bail with conditions. (Para 6)

ORDER

The petitioner is accused No.8 in CC.No.9 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Court for CBI Cases, Madurai. The petitioner and other accused were tried and the petitioner has been found guilty and convicted as follows:

As against the conviction and sentence, the petitioner has filed an appeal in CrlA(MD)No.52 of 2026 and it has been admitted by this court. The petitioner has also moved this petition to suspend the sentence.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is only a post man. There is no documentary evidence to substantiate the case of the prosecution and they have failed to substantiate their case. Further, the provisions under Section 311 CrPC have been violated in this case. He further submits that the other accused including the main accused were released on bail by this court by suspending the sentence imposed on them while entertaining the criminal appeals filed by them. Therefore, he prays that the sentence be suspended pending this criminal appeal.

3.The learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner has been found guilty for several offence and imposed with imprisonment as mentioned above and he is in jail.

4.This court considered the rival submissions made and perused the material placed on record.

5.The petitioner has raised certain arguable points in this petition, which can be considered only during the final hearing of the appeal. However the appeal could not be taken up for final hearing for want of time. Considering the period of sentence imposed, co-accused have been enlarged on bail pending the appeals and for the reason that the appeal could not be taken up immediately, this Court is inclined to allow this petition.

6.Accordingly this petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner alone is suspended pending disposal of the criminal appeal on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the II Additional District Judge for CBI Cases, Madurai.

(ii) The petitioner shall file an affidavit before the respondent police that he will not misuse this liberty and will not indulge in any further offence.

(iii) The petitioner shall report before the trial court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 am.

(iv) If the petitioner violates any of the conditions, the respondent police shall move an application to cancel the order of suspension of sentence of imprisonment.

03.03.2026 Index : Yes / No DSK To

1.The Inspector of Police, SPE:CBI-ACB, Chennai, 2.II Additional District Judge for CBI Cases, Madurai.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai. Copy to The Special Public Prosecutor for CBI, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

B.PUGALENDHI.J., DSK

03.03.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top