Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
N.V.Selvadurai – Appellant
Versus
State through the Inspector of Police, SPE:CBI-ACB, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition overview and details of the case. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments of petitioner and respondent regarding the appeal. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's considerations and reasoning in allowing bail. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. final order granting bail with conditions. (Para 6) |
ORDER
The petitioner is accused No.8 in CC.No.9 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Court for CBI Cases, Madurai. The petitioner and other accused were tried and the petitioner has been found guilty and convicted as follows:
As against the conviction and sentence, the petitioner has filed an appeal in CrlA(MD)No.52 of 2026 and it has been admitted by this court. The petitioner has also moved this petition to suspend the sentence.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is only a post man. There is no documentary evidence to substantiate the case of the prosecution and they have failed to substantiate their case. Further, the provisions under Section 311 CrPC have been violated in this case. He further submits that the other accused including the main accused were released on bail by this court by suspending the sentence imposed on them while entertaining the criminal appeals f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
