Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
P.Kalaiselvan – Appellant
Versus
State rep. By The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations involve matrimonial discord and need for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposition to bail based on nature of allegations against the petitioners. (Para 4) |
| 3. bail granted with specific conditions to ensure compliance and address concerns of authorities. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
The petitioners, apprehending arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 85 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.12 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners subjected the defacto complainant to cruelty and harassment. Hence, the case has been registered.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the marriage between the first petitioner and the defacto complainant took place on 27.08.2025. However, immediately after the marriage, the defacto complainant left the matrimonial home and has been living separately. It is the further contention of the learned counsel that the brother and sister-in-law have been falsely implicated in the case. He would also submit that the defacto complainant has, through the police, expressed her willingn
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
