Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.Kumarappan, J
N.Muthamilselvan – Appellant
Versus
The State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Keelaiyur Police Station, Nagapattinam District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' apprehension of arrest and allegations (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. nature of allegations and defense arguments (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's inclination to grant bail based on circumstances (Para 5) |
| 4. conditions under which bail is granted (Para 6) |
ORDER
The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under Sections
191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.34 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioners is that, due to love affair, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the alleged occurrence arose out of a group clash in the village due to a dispute between two individuals in relation to a woman. According to him, the petitioners had no role in the alleged incident and have been falsely implicated in the case. Hence, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail, reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instruct
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
