Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18174
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. SOUNTHAR, J
A.Perumal – Appellant
Versus
Irulappan – Respondent
CMP.No.2180 of 2023
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.Kaithamalai Kumaran
For the Respondents: N.Manoharan
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.Kaithamalai Kumaran
For the Respondents: N.Manoharan
Important Points
Appeal dismissed due to the death of both appellants without legal representation.
Subject
Civil - Appeal
Headnote
The judgment pertains to CMP.No.2180 of 2023, where the appellants, A.Perumal and P. Soundarajan, were represented by S.Kaithamalai Kumaran while the respondent, Irulappan, was represented by N.Manoharan. The court determined that both appellants were deceased with no legal representatives coming forward, leading to the dismissal of the second appeal as abated based on their absence in proceedings. Furthermore, the court's final conclusion stated that the connected miscellaneous petition is closed, with no costs awarded.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that both the appellants are no more and the legal representatives of the deceased appellants have not approached the counsel for the appellants for taking steps.
2. Recording the said statement, the second appeal is dismissed as abated.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
