Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN, SHAMIM AHMED, JJ
Mr.A.Raghuram, Mr.A.Jayashankar – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Secretary (Technical), Housing and Urban Development, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and the petitioners' claim. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims regarding possession and agreements. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. denial of planning permission and noc by authorities. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's findings and reasoning on unauthorized construction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final decision and dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 14) |
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent on the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
2. The background facts of the case, is that the ground + four floors of the Commercial building, is admittedly constructed in the land owned by the Wakf Board.
3. The writ petitioners claim that they had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the fourth respondent (Mr.Mohammed Nizamuddin Papa) in the year 2012 for lease of the building for a period of 45 years and paid Rs.1,20,00,000/- as lease amount. They further claim that the fourth respondent had derived the leasehold-
right from the said Trust.
4. The further contention of the writ petitioners, is that the construction was put up after obtaining No Objection Cer
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
