SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18193

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Police – Respondent
W.P.No.39101 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.N.Ramesh
For the Respondents: Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Mr.Ramanlaal, Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman, Mr.V.Raghavachari, Mr.P.Krishnan

A petition under Article 226 for police protection and enforcement of a warrant is resolved when possession is successfully delivered under the SARFAESI Act.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus directing police protection and assistance to execute a warrant issued under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The court found that possession had been delivered, hence no further action was required. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without costs.

Table of Content
1. possession delivered under sarfaesi act execution. (Para 1)
2. petition disposed of without costs. (Para 2)

At the outset, it is submitted that the delivery of possession has taken place in compliance of the order passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and therefore, nothing remains to be done.

2. Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top