Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
P.Deivanayaki – Appellant
Versus
N. Prakash – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for maintenance based on financial needs. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. assessment of legality in prior court decisions. (Para 7) |
COMMON ORDER
Since the issue involved and the relief sought in both these revisions are one and the same, they were heard together and decided of vide this common order.
2. These revisions have been filed against the order dated 18.09.2019 made in M.C.No.618 of 2015 on the file of the II Additional Family Court, Chennai.
3. The petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1214 of 2019 has filed the revision, seeking enhancement of the maintenance amount awarded in M.C.No.618 of 2015 on the file of II Additional Family Court, Chennai. The petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1480 of 2019 has filed the revision petition challenging the order of maintenance in M.C.No.618 of 2015, whereby a sum of Rs.5,000/- each was ordered to be paid to the respondents/wife and minor child as interim maintenance by the petitioner/husband.
4. The marriage between the first petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1214 of 2019 and the petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1480 of 2019 was solemnized on 18.01.2013. Out of the wedlock, a male child was born to them, who is the 2nd petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1214 of 20
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
