SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18322

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
J.Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil nadu – Respondent
WP No. 7097 of 2026 | WMP No. 7709 of 2026 | WMP No. 7710 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Mohanavadivelan
For the Respondents:Mr.Abishiekmurthy, Government Advocate for R1, Mr.B.Balaji, Standing Counsel for TNUHDB for R2 & R3

The writ petition is dismissed as unnecessary due to eligibility acknowledgments, despite previous decrees favoring the petitioner.

Headnote:Under the provisions applicable, the petitioner challenged a notice for eviction issued by the Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board, stating it obstructed public and personal use. Previous decrees favoring the petitioner were in dispute. The Court found the writ petition unnecessary due to eligibility acknowledgments in the reviewed allocations. The judgement concluded with the dismissal of the writ petition.

Table of Content
1. challenge against eviction notice. (Para 1)
2. writ petition deemed unnecessary. (Para 2)
3. court dismissed the writ petition. (Para 3)

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

Writ Petition has been instituted challenging the notice issued by the Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board for eviction of encroachers from the boundaries of tenament, since it is causing obstructions to the tenament as well as the public at large and to construct a new block by demolishing the existing structures.

2. The petitioner has already instituted a Civil Suit and a decree came to be issued. Under such circumstance, the present writ petition is not maintainable.

3. However, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Tamilnadu Urban Rehabitat Development Board would submit that the petitioner is found eligible and allotment order has been issued to the petitioner. That being the factum, the writ petition is unnecessary. Hence, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top