Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
N Nagavelu – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Dharmapuri – Respondent
WP No. 7374 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed for writ of mandamus. (Para 1) |
| 2. no writ relief due to existing private dispute. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition dismissed, petitioner to seek legal remedy. (Para 3) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 12.01.2026.
2. Reading of the representation would show that private dispute exists between the parties. Thus, no Writ would lie under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3. Granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent Court of law, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
