SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18371

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
Nigar Ameen W/o.Mohammed Ameen Sait – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Propcare Real Estate Management Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Arbitration Application Nos.670 to 681/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.Rohini Ravikumar
For the Respondent: Mr.Chandramouli Prabhakar

Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act necessitates ensuring funds belong to villa owners are secured pending arbitration.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to Arbitration Applications filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to seek interim protection for 64 villa owners' total payment of Rs.8,37,09,520/- to ensure their rights are safeguarded. The Court ordered that the respondent deposit this amount in a nationalized bank within eight weeks, consolidating concerns about the use of the funds toward maintenance services. The primary issues framed involved the risk of loss for the villa owners due to the respondent's management of the collected funds. The respondent's conduct raised alarms regarding the security of the deposited sum and the services pledged in the maintenance agreement. The applications have been disposed of accordingly.

Table of Content
1. application of section 9 of the arbitration act for interim protection. (Para 1)
2. concerns regarding the use of funds paid by villa owners. (Para 2)
3. need for securing the collected amount and ensuring appropriate management. (Para 4 , 5)
4. ruling on the deposit of funds and continuation of maintenance services. (Para 6)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680 & 681 of 2025 Arbitration Application Nos.670 to 672/2025 Nigar Ameen W/o.Mohammed Ameen Sait .... Applicant in all applns.

Vs.

M/s.Propcare Real Estate Management Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director, Mantri House, # 41, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.

(amended as per order dated 08.12.2025 in A.Nos.5775, 5776/2025, 5777/2025) .... Respondent in all applns.

Arbitration Application Nos.673 to 675/2025

1.Mohammed Fazeel S/o.Mohammed Ameen Sait

2.Nigar Ameen W/o.Mohammed Ameen Sait .... Applicant in all applns.

Vs.

M/s.Propcare Real Estate Management Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director, Mantri House, # 41, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.

(amended as per order dated 08.12.2025 in A.Nos.5778, 5779, 5780/2025) .... Respondent in all applns.

1.Annamalai Lakshmanan S/o.Lakshmanan 2.Annapoorna V W/o.Annamalai Lakshmanan .... Applicant in all applns.

Vs.

M/s.Propcare Real Estate Management Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director, Mantri House, # 41, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.

(amended as per order dated 08.12.2025 in A.Nos.5781, 5782, 5783/2025) .... Respondent in all applns.

Arbitration Application Nos.679 to 681/2025 Krishnakumar Arunachalam S/o.Arunachalam .... Applicant in all applns.

Vs.

M/s.Propcare Real Estate Management Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director, Mantri House, # 41, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.

(amended as per order dated 08.12.2025 in A.Nos.5784, 5785 & 5786/2025) .... Respondent in all applns.

Prayer:

Arbitration Application Nos.670 & 673/2025:

Arbitration Applications filed under Order 14 Rule 8 of the High Court Original Side Rules 1956 read with Section 9 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to pass an order of interim direction thereby directing the respondent company to furnish details of the bank and branch name in which the lump sum interest free refundable maintenance is collected and deposited as per the terms of the Maintenance Agreement dated 05.12.2019 pending disposal of the arbitration.

Arbitration Applications filed under Order 14 Rule 8 of the High Court Original Side Rules 1956 read with Section 9 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to pass an order of interim direction thereby directing the respondent company to furnish statement of accounts for the sum collected towards lump sum interest free refundable maintenance as per the terms of the Maintenance Agreement dated

05.12.2019 pending disposal of the arbitration.

Arbitration Application Nos.672, 675, 678 & 681/2025:

Arbitration Applications filed under Order 14 Rule 8 of the High Court Original Side Rules 1956 read with Section 9 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to pass an order of interim direction thereby directing the respondent company to make all necessary payments and provide all the services set out in Annexure B of the Agreement for Maintenance Services without any interruption pending disposal of the arbitration.

Arbitration Application No.676/2025:

Arbitration Application filed under Order 14 Rule 8 of the High Court Original Side Rules 1956 read with Section 9 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to pass an order of interim direction thereby directing the respondent company to furnish details of the bank and branch name in which the lump sum interest free refundable maintenance is collected and deposited as per the terms of the Maintenance Agreement dated 15.12.2022 pending disposal of the arbitration.

Arbitration Application No.677/2025:

Arbitra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top