SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18375

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J
R.Seethalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Dr.Karthikeyan – Respondent
Contempt Petition | W.P.No. 26642 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. G.Bala
For the Respondents: Mr. C. Selvaraj, Mr.D.R.Arun Kumar

The court addressed a contempt petition where the petitioners emphasized willful disobedience to a prior court order, leading to the closure of the petition.

Headnote:This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, addressing the willful disobedience of the court's order. The court recorded the proceedings shared by the respondents and deemed the contempt petition closed. Aggrieved petitioners may pursue their legal remedies.

Table of Content
1. introduction of the contempt petition and proceedings. (Para 1)
2. conclusion of the contempt petition with options for the petitioners. (Para 2)

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation, placed a copy of the proceedings of the first respondent dated 13.02.2026. A copy of the same has also been served on the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Recording the said proceedings, this Contempt Petition is closed. If the petitioners are aggrieved, it is left open to them to work out their remedy in the manner known to law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top