Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
Moisanraj – Appellant
Versus
Padmanaban (died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks amendment of plaint. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court addresses procedural issues regarding amendment ruling. (Para 5) |
| 3. impugned order set aside; amendment application to be reconsidered. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking amendment of the plaint.
2. The petitioner herein filed a suit seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the ‘B’ Schedule property. Pending suit, the petitioner filed an amendment application seeking amendment of the plaint to include certain particulars as set out in the amendment application. The said application was dismissed by the Trial Court and aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is come before this Court.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in the impugned order, there is no discussion about the amendment application and that the order appears to have been passed as if it relates to a petition for rejection of plaint. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 4. Heard the learned counsel ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
