Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.SURENDER, J
Anand – Appellant
Versus
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed seeking writ for property objection. (Para 1) |
| 2. court reviews available records. (Para 2) |
| 3. government pleader's remarks; court directs inquiry process. (Para 3) |
| 4. court establishes a timeline for decision-making. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to consider the petitioner's objection petition dated 18.02.2026 for not to sub-divided the property in Survey No. 34/10B, Kalingapatti, Iraappusal Village, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 submitted that the second respondent will consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation in accordance with law.
4. In view of the above submission, without going into the merits of the matter, this Court directs the second respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's objection dated 18.02.2026 after conducting an inquiry, which shall include issuing notice to the petitioner, th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
