SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18463

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.SURENDER, J
Alagammal – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy. – Respondent
Writ Petition | Not specified



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. V.G.Vallarasu Chezhiyan
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Ragavendran

The court mandates procedural fairness in administrative decisions affecting property rights, emphasizing the need for notice and inquiry before resolving conflicting claims.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus against the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 15.09.2025 to cancel naththam patta No.437 and issue patta based on long possession of the property. Facts of the Case: The petitioner filed this case seeking direction for the issuance of a patta for a property based on claims of possession, previously held under the naththam patta.

Findings of Court:
The Court noted the submission of the Government Advocate for the respondents and stipulated the need for proper consideration of the petitioner's claims.

Issues: The key issues revolve around whether the second respondent will consider the representation according to law and procedure.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized the necessity for the second respondent to conduct an inquiry with due process including issuing notices to parties involved and adjudicating objections.

Result: The second respondent is directed to complete the assessment and make a decision within twelve weeks regarding the petitioner’s representation.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for property rights assertion. (Para 1 , 2)
2. mandate to respondents for inquiry and due process. (Para 3 , 4)

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated on 15.09.2025 with regards to cancel the naththam patta No.437 and issue patta in the petitioner's name on the basis of long possession in respect of property in S.No. 729/34 respectively situated at Aniyappur Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the second respondent will consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation in accordance with law.

4. In view of the above submission, without going into the merits of the matter, this Court directs the second respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 15.09.2025 after conducting an inquiry, which shall include issuing notice to the petitioner, the fourth respondent and any other persons who may be affected and considering any objections submitted by them. The second respondent shall thereafter pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the event of any rival claims, the same shall be agitated before the competent civil court. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top