SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18471

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.SURENDER, J
Mahalingam – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai – Respondent
Writ Petition | Article 226 | Mu.Mu.A1/289/2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. J.Anandkumar
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R4

The court reinforces the obligation of administrative authorities to adhere to procedural fairness in conducting inquiries under constitutional mandates.

Headnote:The Court addresses the issuance of a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to compel an enquiry as per prior directives (Mu.Mu.A1/289/2021 dated 15.05.2025). It mandates consideration of representations and concludes the enquiry. The order emphasizes the completion of proceedings within sixteen weeks. The Court highlights the procedural framework guiding the second respondent's responsibilities and the necessity of a conclusive outcome on the merits of the case.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for mandamus. (Para 1)
2. court hears parties and reviews materials. (Para 2 , 3)
3. enquiry proceedings to be completed. (Para 4)

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to complete the enquiry as directed by the 1st respondent in the proceedings in Mu.Mu.A1/289/2021 dated 15.05.2025.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents submitted that the second respondent will consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation in accordance with law.

4. In view of the above submission, without going into the merits of the matter, this Court directs the second respondent to consider and conclude the enquiry proceedings dated 15.05.2025 after issuing notice to the petitioner, private respondents and any other persons who may be affected by such decision and considering any objections submitted by them. The second respondent shall thereafter pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top