Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18511
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SRIMATHY, J
Rajesh Kannan – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District. – Respondent
Writ Petition
Important Points
Court orders timely consideration of the petitioner's representation without expressing opinion on merits.
Subject
Writ Petition - Mandamus
Headnote
The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus to remove his name from the history sheet maintained by the police, referencing prior decisions. The Court directs the authorities to address the petitioner's representation in accordance with the law, ensuring no opinion on the merits is implied. The final disposition mandates a response within four weeks, establishing procedural compliance.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.D. Rajaboopathy
For the Respondents:Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (crl. Side), for R-1 & 2
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.D. Rajaboopathy
For the Respondents:Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (crl. Side), for R-1 & 2
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking writ of mandamus (Para 1) |
| 2. respondents to consider representation (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition disposed without costs (Para 3) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.02.2026.
2. This Court without expressing any opinion on merits is directing the official respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.02.2026.and pass orders in accordance to law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
3.With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
