SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18553

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MRS S.SRIMATHY, J
City Club Tenkasi Rep. by its Secretary S. Gajendra Raja – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
WP Crl.(MD) NO. 1078 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Bashyam
For the Respondents:Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Playing rummy without stakes does not constitute illegal gaming under the City Police Act, while stakes invoke police action.

Headnote:This writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to prevent police interference in playing Rummy without stakes. The petitioner claims that their club activity is lawful, as the police often harass them. The court applied Section 3 and 45 of the City Police Act, 1888, clarifying that rummy is permissible without stakes. The court ruled that playing rummy with stakes would attract police action, but without evidence of illegal activity, the police cannot disturb the club. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of with specific directions.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed for police interference prevention. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's claim of lawful rummy play without stakes. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's observation on rummy legality and previous case ruling. (Para 5)
4. court's directive regarding police authority and club activities. (Para 6)
5. final disposition of writ petition. (Para 7)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents from interfering with the lawful activity of playing Rummy (13 cards) without stakes or money by the members of the petitioner club, based on the representation dated 20.02.2026.

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,to forbear the respondents from interfering with the lawful activity of playing Rummy (13 cards) without stakes or money by the members of the petitioner club, based on the representation dated 20.02.2026.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is running a recreation club, where their members play rummy without stakes, and that the police are very frequently interfering and harassing them. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the aforesaid prayer.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Section 3 of the City Police Act, 1888 defines "the Common Gaming House". Section 45 of City Police Act prescribes the punishment for using a place as a "Common Gaming House". A reading of both the provisions show that in a place, where game is played on wager or bet, the police have got right to interfere and prosecute the persons, who run the place, under Section 45 of the City Police Act. In this case, the petitioner is running a recreation club for its members, wherein according to the petitioner, game of rummy is played without stakes.

4. However, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), on instructions, submitted that the police are not causing any disturbance to the activities of the petitioner.

5. The submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) is recorded. It is also seen that a Division Bench of this Court in the case of the Director General of Police, State of Tamil Nadu, Mahalakshmi Cultural Association reported in 2012(2) CTC 484 has gone into this aspect of recreation club permitting the recreation club to play rummy without stakes and held as follows :

"24. On the basis of the above discussions, we arrive at the following conclusions:

(1) The game of rummy (13 card) is only a game of skill even though an element of chance is also involved.

(2) In the event rummy is played by the members or the guests without stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are not attracted.

(3) In the event rummy is played by the members of the guests with stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are attracted.

(4) In the event the Club/Association either allows its members or gusts to play rummy with stakes or make any profit or gain out of such gambling, the police has the authority to invoke the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act.

(5) In order to ascertain as to whether the premises is used as a gaming house for gambling, the police is entitles to invoke Section 23 of the Act."

6. In view of the above, this Court directs that (i) the petitioner Club shall not indulge in any activity by allowing its members or the guests to play rummy (13 cards) with stakes and make profit or gain.

(ii) the police are entitled to take action in the event of any illegal activity is carried on in the Club premises.

(iii) the police shall not disturb the petitioner-Club frequently under the guise of inspection without there being any reliable information as to the illegal activities of the Club or its members or the guests.

7. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top